|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RESEARCH CENTERS
Applications
Careers Convergence Data Center LANs Net/Systems Mgmt. NOSes Outsourcing Routers/Switches Security Service Providers Small/Med. Storage WAN Services Web/e-commerce Wireless/Mobile SITE RESOURCES
Daily News
Newsletters This Week in NW Tests/Reviews Buyer's Guides Opinion Forums Special Issues How to/Primers Case Studies Network Life Encyclopedia IT Briefings TODAY'S NEWS
|
|
Wireless/Mobile / Action plan
If you're concerned about interoperability with existing 802.11b networks, there are two strong high-speed wireless alternatives: In the immediate future, you can migrate to multimode 802.11a/.802.11b. For maximizing throughput and minimizing interference, nothing better is on the horizon. This approach might be most appealing for high-density installations. Its biggest drawback might be cost. In 2003, you should be able to migrate to multimode 802.11a/802.11g or perhaps 802.11g-only.
The 802.11g option, by itself or as part of a multimode system, should provide higher throughput without the potential range and penetration limitations of 802.11a. Throughput will likely suffer on networks with a lot of 802.11b devices, but still may be acceptable. The 802.11g-only products will likely have cost advantages over the multimode options. Longer term, the two multimode approaches probably will converge. In all likelihood, multimode 802.11a/b will disappear, as multimode 802.11a/g becomes the norm. Finally, if you have little or no 802.11b, your best bet might be 802.11a-only products today, which are falling in price. Related LinksApply for your free subscription to Network World. Click here. Or get Network World delivered in PDF each week.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||