Unable to login. Please check your credentials and try again. You can also visit Network World Community to register or for password options.
30582
RE: Review: iSCSI SAN Server shootoutBy Chris on
July 31, 2008, 6:42 pm
Reply | Read entire comment
My goodness - what a terrible test methodology.
Just look at the three leaders alone. NetApp had 20 drives, LeftHand 36 and EqualLogic still came in a very good...
re: benchmarksBy
Frank Wu on
August 4, 2008, 5:10 pm
Reply | Read entire comment
One key iSCSI storage vendor they forgot to test was the Fujitsu ETERNUS 2000 line.....
I thought this was a decent article, but was a little disappointed they...
RE: Review: iSCSI SAN Server shootout By Chris on July 31, 2008, 6:42 pm Reply | Read entire comment My goodness - what a terrible test methodology. Just look at the three leaders alone. NetApp had 20 drives, LeftHand 36 and EqualLogic still came in a very good...
Support/Services hard (impossible?) to evaluate in a magazine te By Joel Snyder on August 6, 2008, 12:22 pm Reply | Read entire comment Frank: Fujitsu didn't really show up on our radar of iSCSI vendors. We ended up inviting 30 different vendors that were identified as key participants. I...
re: benchmarks By Frank Wu on August 4, 2008, 5:10 pm Reply | Read entire comment One key iSCSI storage vendor they forgot to test was the Fujitsu ETERNUS 2000 line..... I thought this was a decent article, but was a little disappointed they...
All comments (4)