- 10 Microsoft research projects
- 10 kitchen gadgets for the geek gourmet
- Verizon trounces competition
- Smartphone smackdown: Storm vs. iPhone
- FBI warns of holiday cyber scams
Cisco take note: Juniper's new EX 4200 switch not only fills a hole in a leading competitor's product line, but also represents a credible alternative for enterprise access switching.
In Network World's exclusive Clear Choice test, we subjected the EX 4200-48T switch to the same rigorous battery of benchmarks we used to assess seven other vendors' 10G Ethernet access switches earlier this year. (See comparative 10G Ethernet switch test.)
The verdict: This is one fast box. The EX 4200 delivered line-rate throughput in every case, the only switch we've tested this year to do so. What's more, 10G Ethernet latency is the lowest we've ever measured. We also were impressed by the EX 4200's feature set and powerful JUNOS command-line interface (CLI).
That's not to suggest Cisco and others should fold up their tents, though. This is Juniper's first effort in enterprise switching, and that inexperience shows in a few places. Multicast support is still a bit rough, and our tests also uncovered a couple of security concerns. Still, this is an impressive device, especially for a first try. (Compare products.)
We tested the $16,800 EX 4200-48T, which offers 48 10/100/1000Mbps gigabit ports, two 10G Ethernet ports, PoE capability on 8 ports, and stacking capability for up to 10 switches. Juniper also offers the EX 4200-48P with 48 ports of PoE capacity from a single power supply for $18,400. Both devices offer optional redundant power supplies and support virtually all switching and routing protocols (see Features spreadsheet).
In access switch tests earlier this year we found throughput no longer is the differentiator as it once was, with most boxes pushing packets either nearly at, or within one percent of, line rate.
With Juniper's EX 4200, there's no need to say "nearly". Even under the heaviest loads our Spirent TestCenter traffic generator threw at it, the switch delivered line-rate throughput in every single unicast and multicast test, both in layer-2 and layer-3 configurations. No other switch did that.
Latency – often a more important metric than throughput, especially for time-sensitive voice and video traffic – was low and consistent across all tests. Measured at line rate, the Juniper switch delayed 64-byte frames across 10G Ethernet links for an average of 1.96 microsec and a maximum of 2.01 microsec.
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications." Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (15)
Really excellent switches!!By jaydee181 on October 26, 2008, 9:23 amI have to say that I really like the EX4200's. We tested a number of switches for use in iSCSI SANs we were deploying We tested: Cisco C3750G and C3750E, Extreme...
Reply | Read entire comment
The latency is not very high on GigabiteEthernet interfaceBy david_newman on July 29, 2008, 4:24 amPer RFC 2544, latency is measured at, and only at, the throughput rate, which in this case was line rate. RFC 4689 introduces a related metric, forwarding delay,...
Reply | Read entire comment
The auto-reboot feature is especially cool...By Fred F on July 28, 2008, 2:19 pmAnother time-to-market piece of crap from Juniper. That review was hilarious. I mean, how many deficiencies can one product have?? If you're serious about your...
Reply | Read entire comment
The latency is very high on GigabiteEthernet interfaceBy Anonymous on July 22, 2008, 5:52 pmThe latency number measured in the article is very high, it's not a fast switch at all. Question for Dave, what's the load on the switch when you measure the latency?...
Reply | Read entire comment
Another switch vendor?By Anonymous on July 20, 2008, 9:29 pmSeriously, shouldn't be Juniper investing in high growth markets instead of trying to get a minimum share in the switching pie? From a biz perspective I don't see...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments