For now, the best bet is the former, even though the RBOCs own the
phone wires and vie for the same customers as the DSL competitive local
exchange carriers. DSL CLECs are running into a financial pinch right
now, but they have wider geographic spreads than individual RBOCs. Plus,
the more experienced CLECs are getting good at squeezing the DSL essentials
out of the RBOCs, a chore still new to the RBOCs.
As a result, delegating the setup of corporate DSL networks to CLECs
can save time and reduce corporate IT staff involvement, both of which
translate into cost savings for enterprise customers.
Looking ahead, though, the advantage is shifting rapidly to the RBOCs,
as these deep-pocketed behemoths gather speed and ultimately overtake
their fast-starting adversaries.
Struggle Summary
|
| The
struggle: |
Upstart DSL service providers that cater to businesses rely
on their competitors, the regional Bell operating companies, for the lines
that carry DSL service. Cooperation could be better. |
| The opponents: |
DSL CLECs, young companies that specialize in providing DSL
services for businesses vs. RBOCs, which own the phone lines the DSL CLECs
need and that also sell DSL services. |
| Outlook for resolution: |
Even though the RBOCs will become more
cooperative, they will win. The weaker DSL CLECs will go bankrupt, and the
stronger will be absorbed by larger providers. |
| User impact: |
Getting DSL service will get easier, but not right away. This
will happen gradually, and eventually the process will become routine.
|
A multilayered service
To set up DSL access to corporate VPNs, enterprise network managers
have few options. They can buy DSL lines from the RBOC serving their
remote sites, hooking those workers to the corporate site. But coordinating
a DSL deployment that involves more than one RBOC, and potentially more
than one ISP, can be a hassle. Youve got to negotiate with the
carriers one at a time and hope that you can establish similar monitoring
and technical support services agreements with each.
"Youre better off getting someone else to act on your behalf.
It saves 15% to 20% in operating costs if you go to one provider rather
than many for DSL service," says Steve Sazegari, principal at telecom
consulting firm Tele.Mac.
That someone else can be a DSL CLEC that deals with the RBOCs, setting
up and delivering the lines. It can be an ISP that works with a DSL
CLEC on line delivery. Or it can be a service provider that gets DSL
lines through DSL CLECs, then bundles that DSL service with Internet
access and network monitoring. Fiberlink, a provider of Internet-based
VPNs, is one such company.
Whichever way you go, youll probably find that delivery and support
could be better. DSL CLECs say the RBOCs - BellSouth, Qwest Communications,
SBC Communications and Verizon - purposely drag their feet to slow delivery
times.
"Everyones hands are tied by the local carrier. If any improvements
are to be made, they must take place at the local carrier," says
Michael Asmus, a network consultant, who lived through his own four-month
DSL-installation ordeal.
Carriers are making progress. A line-sharing method introduced this
year should help streamline the process by which CLECs obtain phone
lines from RBOCs. Line sharing lets a CLEC run DSL over the same phone
line an RBOC is using to provide regular voice service. Its accomplished
using standard DSL and phone equipment, splitting voice channels to
the phone network and data to the DSL network. Alternatively, CLECs
have to order separate pairs of phone wires just to carry DSL.
Line sharing, which went into use this summer, is expected to become
the dominant way DSL lines are provisioned in 2001, CLECs say. Enterprise
IT managers will be able to more easily set up and add to telecommuter
DSL networks because line sharing will cut the average provisioning
time from 35 to 15 days or less, says Vinu Sundaresan, vice president
of software engineering for Covad Communications, a struggling CLEC
in Santa Clara.
Extended links
DSL CLECs and RBOCs are also in the process of linking their ordering
systems. RBOCs have worked out how to let CLECs access their proprietary
systems, and these bonded ordering systems are coming online now. When
these links are completed, a customer request entered into a CLEC ordering
system will be dropped into the RBOC ordering system. CLECs will no
longer have to fill out and fax order forms to RBOCs, which in turn
enter the order into their systems by hand.
Covad has extended this speedy electronic bonding to customers via
a Web interface. Customers can check for DSL availability from www.covad.com
and place orders. From the Web, the order passes into Covads ordering
system and to the RBOCs. Covad says 80% of its orders come via
this method.
These advances will ultimately work to the advantage of the RBOCs,
which will probably buy up the DSL CLECs to beef up their own DSL deployment.
SBC has bought a share of Covad, and Verizon flirted with buying NorthPoint
Communications before backing out last month. More of these RBOC/CLEC
pairings are likely to come to fruition in 2001, says Brent Bracelin,
a financial analyst with Pacific Crest Securities.
DSL CLECs, once the darlings of Wall Street and venture capitalists,
are under pressure to turn big profits quickly. Financing is drying
up and CLECs will look more favorably on being bought out than they
might have a year ago, he says.
But dont despair about DSL itself; it will still be around even
if youre getting it from a different carrier than you originally
signed with.