Search and DocFinder
 
Search help/advanced search

 


News NetFlash: Daily News Internat'l News This Week in NW The Edge Net.Worker Features Research Buyer's Guides Reviews Technology Primers Vendor Profiles Forums Columnists Knowledgebase Help Desk Dr. Intranet Gearhead Careers Free Newsletters Subscription Center Seminars/Events Reprints/Links White Papers Partner with Us Site Map Contact Us Awards Corporate info Home









By Susan Marks
Network World, 12/24/01
[Back to Trash talk over data disposal]

Data disposal at some companies means removing files from front-line networks to subsequent storage environments and eventual long-term archiving in perpetuity. At others, disposal means a series of preset storage-area network options that end with data destruction.

Bob Zimmerman, director of storage research at Giga Information Group, advocates long-term data storage. Keeping data around is just an expense. Losing the data is sometimes disastrous, he says.

To back up his point, Zimmerman recalls the case of a senior engineer working on seismic data for an oil company. The engineer took a lengthy sabbatical  and returned to find all his data gone. It seems that he was not familiar with the IT department's process of deleting data after 18 months. "So there are upsides and downsides to data disposal," he adds.

 "I never recommend blowing the data away. I think it is always cheaper to dump it on a tape and send it off to a salt mine, [because] if you ever have to recover some of the stuff that you inadvertently or purposely threw away, recreating it is going to cost you more than you ever saved in all of the throwaways that you made," Zimmerman says.

But Pat Tagtow, senior counsel for BMC Software, questions the wisdom of archiving data for indefinite periods of time. "You may be in a little more organized fashion, but you're not managing in a prudent manner. The concept of the information management program is that you are going to have a manageable amount of information and when you destroy data or when something is no longer needed, it's gone so you don't have to manage it any longer."


Advertisement:

Roger Craycraft, CIO of Ashland, a chemical and petroleum company in Covington, Ky., agrees. When a retention period ends at Ashland, the data is eliminated. "I don't think we want to necessarily [even] be in a position to recover it," he says.

Whatever the final policy, to avoid confrontation with users, initially implement the system so the data is removed from the disk but backed up so it can be recovered, recommends Pete Lindstrom, an analyst with Hurwitz Group.

Apply for your free subscription to Network World. Click here.

Get Copyright Clearance
Request a reprint or permission to use this article.

Send this article to a colleague

Please select a type of format for the email you want to send:
TEXT
HTML
Recipient's name:

Recipient's e-mail:
Your name:

Your e-mail:
Comments:

Feedback

Tell us your thoughts on this article or the issues raised in it. We'll cc: the author and editors on all comments.

Comments:

Name:
E-mail address:

Can we post your comments in an online forum on the topic?
Yes No

What did you think of this article?
Very useful Somewhat useful Not at all useful

Would you want to see:
More articles on this topic
Fewer articles on this topic

Thank you! When you click Submit, you'll be taken back to this article.

Trash talk over data disposal
Can Ethernet be your MAN?
RBOCs go the distance
A taxing dilemma for telework
The VPN performance game

Disposal guidelines
Storage hierarchy
Setting policies
To delete or not?
More Management Strategies
Best
Buzz
You
NetworkWorld 200
Ecomm Issue
 

Responsible for insuring the safety of your network?

NWFusion offers two FREE security e-mail newsletters to help you keep your enterprise network secure.

Click here to sign-up.

Advertisement:


Editorial Partners program
Three free and easy ways to bring Network World's in-depth editorial content to your own Web site.
Learn more




  Copyright, 1995-2002 Network World, Inc. All rights reserved.