- BlackBerry Storm vs. the iPhone
- 2008 IT industry graveyard
- Top 10 worst uses for Windows
- Economic crisis means double duty for IT pros
- BlackBerry Storm, RIM's first touchscreen device, rolls in
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:Application Performance Solutions | App Performance | Networking Solution | SafeGuard Enterprise Solution Center | SOA | Test your Web Filter | Value of WDS
![]() |
|

For the fifth year running, Cisco's John Chambers grabs the top spot in our annual Powerometer survey, a reader ranking of CEO power. This year, Microsoft's Steve Ballmer, Intel's Craig Barrett, IBM's Sam Palmisano and HP's Carly Fiorina fill out the remaining Top 5 slots, according to 250 readers surveyed.
Palmisano's relative power has increased this year, as has Fiorina's. While respondents lowered both CEO's Power Ratings, Palmisano inched up to No. 4 this year, while Fiorina scored high enough to climb into the Top 5. These two leaders' chameleon-like abilities to adapt to changing industry dynamics are serving their respective companies well, respondents say. (See How we did it.)
SBC's Ed Whitacre, 3Com's Bruce Claflin and Sun's Scott McNealy also made significant moves up the rankings this year. Whitacre earns credit for leading SBC to big deals, such as a landmark managed VoIP services contract with Ford Motor and a Wi-Fi hot-spot agreement with UPS for its retail outlets. Claflin gets applause for combating Cisco on price, and McNealy wins credit for Sun's steady stream of new products.
Three CEOs slid down by three or more ranks in 2004: EMC's Joe Tucci, AT&T's David Dorman and Verizon's Ivan Seidenberg. Tucci's slide reflects reader uncertainty about the company's strategic direction. Dorman's fall results from continued uncertainty over AT&T's long-term viability. Seidenberg's drop was Whitacre's gain - as the two nearly swapped positions from last year.
Three new CEOs graced the survey this year, each achieving the same rank as their companies did in our related Powerometer survey of vendor power. Dell's Kevin Rollins, new to the survey, landed at No. 8 compared with the No. 4 rank held by his predecessor, Michael Dell, in 2003. Symantec's John Thompson entered at No. 15, while McAfee's George Samunek made his debut at No. 18.
| 2004 Power Rating Using a scale of 1 to 100, with 100 representing the highest level, 250 readers crowned Cisco CEO John Chambers as the most powerful vendor CEO. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*Michael Dell, former CEO, ranked No. 4 in 2003. **Frank Dunn, former CEO, ranked No. 11 in 2003. ***This is the first year in the survey for the company and its CEO. ****Sanjay Kumar, former CEO, ranked No. 16 in 2003. Since the survey, John Swainson has been appointed CEO. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power gains Gutsy maneuvering accounts for the uptick in Power Rating for these six CEOs.
|
Power losses These four CEOs have slid down the ranks as network executives struggle to understand their product/service strategies.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Of good reputeWhen your organization is selecting strategic vendors, how important is the CEO’s reputation? SOURCE: NETWORK WORLD |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| How we did it With the help of market research firm Research Concepts, we asked 250 readers to rate the power of 20 network vendors and their CEOs. We used a scale of 1 to 100, with 1 representing the low mark and 100 the high. We obtained the Power Rating by calculating the mean. We then used the Power Rating to rank the companies and individuals from highest to lowest rating. This allows us to examine two key measures of power: objective and relative. We determine objective power by comparing the current Power Rating with the previous one. To measure relative power, we examine how the Power Rating has affected rank. A Power Rating can wane while rank improves. For instance, in 2004, the Power Rating for HP CEO Carly Fiorina declined by 3.6% from 53.5 in 2003 to 50.2 in 2004. However, her position on the list increased by two ranks, from No. 7 in 2003 to No. 5 in 2004. |
Comment