Search and DocFinder
 
Search help/advanced search

 


News NetFlash: Daily News Internat'l News This Week in NW The Edge Net.Worker Features Research Buyer's Guides Reviews Technology Primers Vendor Profiles Forums Columnists Knowledgebase Help Desk Dr. Intranet Gearhead Careers Free Newsletters Subscription Center Seminars/Events Reprints/Links White Papers Partner with Us Site Map Contact Us Awards Corporate info Home









By Julie Bort
Network World, 04/29/02

Harald Alvestrand
Howard Anderson
Scott Kriens
John McAdam
John Nallin
John Patrick
Back to the state of the network union

We asked six luminaries how they view the network industry's current state. Among observations about the industry's performance in 2001 and predictions for 2002, they also had these things to say.

Our six participants were:

Harald Alvestrand, a Cisco engineer in Trondheim, Norway, appointed chair of the IETF in 2001, the first from outside the United States to hold this post.

Howard Anderson, senior managing director of venture capital firm YankeeTek Ventures, in Cambridge, Mass.; founder of The Yankee Group; and teacher of entrepreneurship at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Scott Kriens, CEO of No. 2 worldwide router maker Juniper Networks, in Sunnyvale, Calif.

John McAdam, CEO of Seattle-based traffic management software maker F5 Networks, whose stock price tumbled with the 2000 Internet crash, but bucked the trend and nearly tripled in 2001 from the mid $5 range to the mid $20s.

John Nallin, vice president of IS for user behemoth UPS, in Mahwah, N.J.,with a $1 billion tech budget.

John Patrick, long-time IBM Internet guru (retired to consultant status in December 2001), chair of think tank Global Internet Project, and author of the best-selling Net Attitude.

Advertisement:

Harald Alvestrand

On cooperation among international standards organizations:

"[The IETF and ITU] are managing to cooperate and that's encouraging. Nobody would have predicted that 10 years prior. Some people were predicting that the IETF would go away and other people said the ITU would go away, but no one predicted that we would work together."

On globalization:

"We are getting away from the situation where you could make standards by thinking that you were only making them for the American market. It hasn't made sense for a long time, although some people thought it did. But we have to be global, there's only one world."

On how the Internet influences globalization:

"One of the revelations that the Internet has taught us is first, you start cooperating. Then you discover what time zone you are [all] in, then you discover what country you [all] are in."

On IETF participation:

"The absolute number of companies involved [in the IETF] has become smaller. A lot of smaller companies that participated in the past have gone under, been bought up by larger companies or simply can't afford to be there anymore. It is also part of the maturing of the industry that there aren't huge new markets being opened by standards action. That also means that there aren't huge markets being lost by lack of standards action."

On the politics of making standards:

"I started out in the IETF in '91 with MIME e-mail, which was about people coming together with lots of ideas and then rolling out something [completely different]. And the community said: 'Yes that's a great idea, we'll just make a few gratuitous changes [in our product] to what you had in the standard so that it's not compatible anymore.' None of this is surprising. To a certain degree, standards are more about people's willingness to go forward than they are about technology. Without a champion, the process rarely concludes."

On Linux:

"Linux proves that even good ideas can get into trouble. Linux is an example that lots of people working together can get things done, but it's also clear that lots of people working together can get into cooperation problems."

To top

Howard Anderson

On the fate of long distance:

"What we had not understood two years ago is that the real enemy of long distance was not RBOCs, but wireless companies. A tremendous amount of traffic is going to them. 'Free' is very hard to compete against."

On new network applications and services:

"The new applications are not going to happen, a lot of them are useless or just plain silly, like using a wireless phone to buy Cokes from a vending machine."

To top

Scott Kriens

On globalization:

"There will be only one market, and that is the planet. The concept of regional networking markets - eventually - will give way and will be true of equipment technology companies and service providers.

On IP:

"The reason IP is so popular is that it is open around the world. It inevitably cannot be denied."

On new network applications and services:

"It was clearly the intent of the industry to deliver intelligent services and value-added services across the world to enable new capabilities for users. That was certainly done on a small scale, but not on a scale that was hoped for [in 2001]. ... We're talking about fundamentally re-honing literally hundreds of billions of dollars worth of infrastructure, which is carrying today almost a $100 trillion of services revenue. That rededication is not going to be easy or done in any one year.

To top

John McAdam

On the effects of the economy:

"In spite of the capital spending reductions last year, a lot of projects have continued [in 2002], but have at a slightly slower [pace] than last year. Companies have kept an eye on competitive advantage in the Internet."

On running a business in today's climate:

"Two to three years ago, the growth was so strong that companies weren't running their businesses weekly. In the last 14 months, we have focused our business weekly. Every Monday, we have a meeting. We look at head counts - making sure the expenses are under control. We look at sales forecasts, the number of boxes shipped and compare that to the same week of the [previous three] quarters. We make sure we're on the upside of the graph. We have a weekly forecast, look at the major opportunities won or lost, look at cash flow, cash collected. It's amazing to me, even with some of the high-profile [accounting] things going on - that companies seem to avoid cash."

On the requirements of enterprises:

"One of the big things we did was to shift our selling [efforts] from dot-coms to the enterprise. There's a number of things you need to do [for that]. You need to have a good financial record, a great cash position with no debt, the P&L efficiencies. You need global reach partners. But you also need customers that use [the] products in significant ways, and you need customer satisfaction [percentage] levels in the 80s or 90s - that's what the enterprise expects."

On security:

"At some stage, I see the whole Internet encrypted. That [could] take two or three years."

To top

John Nallin

On capacity planning:

"Right now we're buying servers that can come with twice the capacity we need, and if we put 'em on the floor and don't use [the excess capacity], we don't use it, and if we need it it's there. I'm sure that if capacity on demand becomes more prevalent - which I'm sure it will - it's going to be a whole different ballgame."

On the storage market:

"If you talked to us five years ago, we would have said that IBM is our standard for DASD [direct-attached storage device.] If you talked to us two years ago, we would have told you we don't use anyone but EMC. Today, we'll tell you we have two vendors, IBM and EMC for our DASD. It's a never-ending cycle. When EMC was on the low end they did things to entice you to buy their product. When they were on the top end, IBM discovered that if they didn't do something, they would lose business, so they produced a better product. It's leapfrog. And storage-area networks is an opportunity for someone else to jump in."

On post-dot-com era expectations:

"With the fallout from the Internet [crash], the optimism that everything's going to take care of itself certainly has changed. Things that - I wouldn't say we were promised - but that we perceived were going to be available, this unlimited bandwidth, immediacy of everything, did not materialize."

On the pain of vendor management:

"Every [vendor] wants to be a partner. I want a partner that I can really trust and that has my - and my company's - best interests in mind. If that's the case, I am willing to accept compromises on certain things. It becomes too difficult when you have a large environment and you are counting on someone and they don't come through, for whatever reason. In a lot of cases, they are not doing that intentionally, but they may know more about the risk [of their product, service or timeline] then they are willing to tell you."

To top

John Patrick

On how 802.11 mirrors the Internet:

"I was riding through Bridgefield, Conn., a little New England town of 20,000 people, and stopped at a Subway to get a sandwich. I had my ThinkPad and read some e-mail. I had just returned from a conference where I talked to Sky Daton, the guy that started Earthlink. He has a new company called Boingo [Wireless] with software that picks up 802.11 signals and lists them.

"So I bring up the Boingo client and boom, there's a signal. I bring up a browser and I go to DSLreports.com. I'm getting 1.2M bit/sec. I download e-mail, start my IM client and chat with my son. I'm saying, 'How cool is this?'

"This is not only cool, it is profound. This is exactly where we were in 1992-93 with the Internet. I was giving speeches then saying we are going to do everything on the Internet and people would say, 'John, you don't understand. It's not secure. It's not scaleable. It doesn't have encryption or authentication. It's unreliable. It doesn't work everywhere.' This long list of objections. Now I'm talking about 802.11, and I hear, 'Yeah, but it's not secure, not reliable, not available everywhere, etc.' and I say, 'Hey, I've heard this tune before.' "

On 802.11 security:

"So what are the key problems [with 802.11]? Security is the thing everyone brings up. Well, WEP [Wired Equivalent Privacy] does have some shortcomings, but they are well understood - encryption technology is well understood. And there's a [federal government] working group releasing a standard [called] advanced encryption services, which is 128-bit."


Related links

Howard Anderson's "Yankee Ingenuity"
An archive of Anderson's Network World columns.

This year I'm definitely going to . . .
Consider these money-saving projects recommended by your peers.
Network World, 01/07/02

Network World's Technology Executive newsletter
Looking for the big picture behind all the buzzwords and tech-speak? Get the 30,000-foot view on a variety of network-related technologies for CEOs, CTOs, CIOs - or any other kind of CXO.

Network World's NetFlash newsletter
Watch the future of the networking industry unfold via our daily dispatch of the latest networking news.

Apply for your free subscription to Network World. Click here.

Get Copyright Clearance
Request a reprint or permission to use this article.

Send this article to a colleague

Please select a type of format for the email you want to send:
TEXT
HTML
Recipient's name:

Recipient's e-mail:
Your name:

Your e-mail:
Comments:

Feedback

Tell us your thoughts on this article or the issues raised in it. We'll cc: the author and editors on all comments.

Comments:

Name:
E-mail address:

Can we post your comments in an online forum on the topic?
Yes No

What did you think of this article?
Very useful Somewhat useful Not at all useful

Would you want to see:
More articles on this topic
Fewer articles on this topic

Thank you! When you click Submit, you'll be taken back to this article.

 

Responsible for insuring the safety of your network?

NWFusion offers two FREE security e-mail newsletters to help you keep your enterprise network secure.

Click here to sign-up.

Advertisement:


Editorial Partners program
Three free and easy ways to bring Network World's in-depth editorial content to your own Web site.
Learn more




  Copyright, 1995-2002 Network World, Inc. All rights reserved.