- Top 16 Chinese iPhoneys
- 23 things I wish would just go away
- Credit card skimming
- System admin steals almost 20,000 pieces of gear
- Microsoft will float cloud OS this month
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:Application Performance Solutions | App Performance | Networking Solution | SafeGuard Enterprise Solution Center | SOA | Value of WDS
Senior Editor Tim Greene clarifies issues surrounding the evolving NAC security architecture.
Symantec's endpoint-based NAC software performs what the company calls peer-to-peer NAC - a way to limit the damage that infected endpoints might inflict.
Symantec NAC enforcement is located in its endpoint software, so each endpoint contains knowledge of its own configuration-compliance status.
With peer-to-peer NAC, groups of endpoints fitted out with Symantec’s NAC software can be restricted to talking only to other endpoints in their group and only of those endpoints meet NAC requirements. The peer-to-peer NAC software does not restrict what servers endpoints can reach.
When a protected endpoint receives TCP or UDP connection attempts from another device in its group, the initiating device must declare its NAC status. If the initiating device is out of NAC compliance, the connection is denied (Compare NAC products).
NAC doesn’t guarantee that devices are free of infections, just that their configurations comply with network NAC policies. This mitigates risk.
By requiring that peer devices also comply with NAC configuration policies, peer-to-peer NAC can reduce the chances that machines will become infected via peer devices.
These peer groups are set up in Symantec’s policy manager, and the policies within the group deal with incoming traffic only.
The big limit of this feature is that it can apply only to machines that are managed and have the Symantec NAC client. So guest machines and those owned by consultants would not support this feature, and they would have to be isolated via other means.
Even so, this peer-to-peer feature is another layer of protection on the risk-mitigation side of the equation, which can’t hurt.
Tim Greene is senior editor at Network World.

The Vista era of Windows is here. Yet most organizations will retain Windows XP alongside new Vista...
Vulnerability Management For DummiesDownload this concise book "Vulnerability Management for Dummies," to learn about the simple steps...
Security Considerations When Deploying Remote Access SolutionsEffective network security is most successful when you use a layered approach, with multiple...

The Vista era of Windows is here. Yet most organizations will retain Windows XP alongside new Vista...
Turning information into a Competitive AdvantageCompanies today are realizing that competitive advantage is harder to sustain when based solely on...
PoE Plus: Impact on the PoE MarketThe standard for Power over Ethernet (PoE), IEEE Std. 802.3af(tm)-2003, advanced networking,...

Discover why Unified Threat Management Firewalls are ready for the enterprise today. High...
The Evolution of Network SecurityWe have so many holes punched in our firewalls today that many industry insiders question the value...
The self-managed networkWe aren't there yet, but advances in network and systems management tools are making it possible to...
Partner Content
Brilliantly simple security and control solutions for email, web and endpoint
www.sophos.com
Stopping data leakage
Learn how to exploit your current security investment to control the information that flows into, through and out of your network.
Download the white paper.
Why detection rates aren't enough
Evaluating endpoint security products is a time-consuming and daunting task. Learn the six critical questions you need to ask prospective vendors to get the right endpoint solution.
Download the white paper.
Applications: taking back control
Employees installing unauthorized applications is a growing threat to business security and productivity. Cost-effectively reduce this threat by integrating control into your malware protection.
Learn more today.
Comments (1)
Symantec's Peer-to-Peer NAC Definition is LimitedBy Anonymous on June 4, 2008, 11:19 amAs noted in your article, the problem is it doesn't handle guests or rogue devices which are key reasons for deploying NAC. Their approach is similar to Microsoft...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments