Search /
Docfinder:
Advanced search  |  Help  |  Site map
RESEARCH CENTERS
SITE RESOURCES
Click for Layer 8! No, really, click NOW!
Networking for Small Business
TODAY'S NEWS
Microsoft virtualization tools reinforce user's data center plans
Air traffic network glitch cleared-up for now
Cisco buys into e-mail with $215 million PostPath acquisition
Locked iPhones can be unlocked without a password
Baseball's video and secure telephone links ready for instant replay
China aims for petaflop computer in 2010
Mozilla garners praise over Firefox security feature
Mt. Sinai Medical Center looks to open standards for patient smartcards
Immersion to pay Microsoft $20 million to settle patent suit
Expand Networks secures $8.5 million in venture capital
Alcatel-Lucent intros Gigabit Ethernet switches
Storage market thrives in down economy
Hosted RFID service targets mobile users
Best Western downplays data breach
Google drops Bluetooth, GTalkService APIs from Android 1.0

Keeping e-mail secure: No easy chore

Related linksToday's breaking news
Send to a friendFeedback


Considering the sensitivity of information sent via e-mail, securing that correspondence is naturally a high-level concern.

Let's say you're an e-mail administrator, and you show up at work and get the fateful call. Your CEO had a nightmare about e-mail being used in an antitrust case, or documents being hijacked by a competitor. As a result, the firm's head of IT mandates that you secure all internal and external e-mail.

Unencrypted messages can be hijacked in transit and read or altered. If the mail is not digitally signed, you can't be sure where it came from.

Advertisement:

There are many options for securing e-mail, all with a few strengths and probably more weaknesses.

Let's take care of the easy decisions. Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) should be the message encryption and digital signature format because it's the accepted standard and is built into leading e-mail clients such as Microsoft Outlook 98/2000 and Lotus Notes R5. Yet a standard such as S/MIME only takes you so far. Each vendor has implemented its own interpretation of S/MIME, which makes interoperability problematic. This drawback is exacerbated by the emergence of S/MIME Version 3 in the newest e-mail clients, which again could create interoperability issues.

The path of least resistance is to get an e-mail security gateway, which is analogous to a firewall for e-mail. Every message going in or out passes through the gateway, allowing security policies to be enforced (where and when messages can be sent), virus checking to be performed, and messages to be signed and encrypted. One drawback of the gateway approach is that it doesn't provide user-based security. For example, the gateway encrypts outbound messages so recipients can verify they came from your company, but recipients can't prove from whom they came.

Client-based methods use your private key to sign messages (proving it came from you), which is a more granular level of security, but they have weaknesses as well. First, they need to be configured on each desktop, which includes issuing a digital certificate to each user (for encryption and digital signature), and ensuring that a proper security profile is configured within the e-mail client. This requires a fair amount of user training and help desk assistance. Of course, if the profile is wrong - for example, specifying the wrong certificate or turning off encryption - the messages are not secure. And there is no way for an administrator to centrally control the profiles.

There are also a number of Web-based secure mail services that keep all messages within their environment at all times to ensure security. You use a secure site on the Internet to compose a message. Once you hit "Send," the site encrypts and stores the message on its site, and sends the recipient an e-mail notification that a secure message is waiting. The recipient links to the site, provides a shared secret for authentication, and accesses the message via Secure Sockets Layer. Unfortunately, this method does not work with existing enterprise e-mail systems.

The stickiest issue is building a directory of digital certificates. This directory holds the certificates needed to encrypt messages to a recipient. Internally, building the directory may not be a big deal because all certificates for a company can be published in a central Lightweight Directory Access Protocol server, but externally this causes many problems. You will need to establish an agreement with a recipient's organization to ensure access to the right digital certificates. This process, however, creates more user training issues and adds complexity to e-mail communications.

Although there is technology available for secure e-mail, widespread deployment is still problematic. However, as more companies and regular e-mail users see the need to secure their messages, the use of digital certificates will one day become a transparent part of your everyday activities.

Upclose: E-mail security options

Rothman is executive vice president of SHYM Technology, a security company. He can be reached at mrothman@shym.com.

Related Links

 
NWFusion offers more than 40 FREE technology-specific email newsletters in key network technology areas such as NSM, VPNs, Convergence, Security and more.
Click here to sign up!
New Event - WANs: Optimizing Your Network Now.
Hear from the experts about the innovations that are already starting to shake up the WAN world. Free Network World Technology Tour and Expo in Dallas, San Francisco, Washington DC, and New York.
Attend FREE
Your FREE Network World subscription will also include breaking news and information on wireless, storage, infrastructure, carriers and SPs, enterprise applications, videoconferencing, plus product reviews, technology insiders, management surveys and technology updates - GET IT NOW.
* HOME    * RESEARCH CENTERS     * NEWS     * EVENTS

Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy | How to Advertise
Reprints and links | Partnerships | Subscribe to NW
About Network World, Inc.

Copyright, 1994-2006 Network World, Inc. All rights reserved.