The telecommunications industry remains split over the need for structural separation in the National Broadband Network (NBN), after submissions to government from ISPs and consumer advocacy groups failed to agree on a suitable regulatory framework.

Submissions by Telstra, the Terria consortium and the Australian Telecommunications User Group (ATUG) were divided over the need for the NBN builder to have horizontal structurally separated retail and wholesale arms, a point which has been a bone of contention for the entirety of the tender process.

Telstra has staunchly refused to accept any form of structural separation, favoring share-holder interests, while its rivals argue it is essential to avoid handing the contract winner a network monopoly.

Proponents claim the government's promised A$50 ($48) NBN access prices will be impossible if retail and wholesale operations are contained in the same company.

Optus government and corporate affairs director Maha Krishnapillai attacked Telstra's refusal to make wholesale NBN access independent in the event it would build the network.

"The structural separation of Telstra and the upgrade of regulatory settings will finally break the multi-year cycle of Telstra litigating and undermining competition by creating fear, uncertainty and delay," Krishnapillai said.

"The focus of this submission is deliberately directed at the reforms that would need to be made to the regulatory framework should Telstra be chosen to construct and operate the NBN. That is, it consciously contemplates the "worst case scenario" for competition.

"Structural separation must be at the core of any regulatory reform."

Such regulation, Optus argues, will reduce involvement from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) and future-proof proceeding fiber (FttX) deployments.

Structural separation is necessary for the NBN, according to ATUG's submission, although an organizational split of the operator is not essential.

Managing director Rosemary Sinclair said access to the fiber-to-the-Node (FttN) network could be sold through a functionally separated structure.

"It's open to bidders, but structural separation is the best. The absolute bottom requirement is functional separation where there is a clear delineation between the wholesale provider and the retail unit," Sinclair said. A group dubbed NBN Australia would ensure the wholesale prices remain competitive, under ATUG's plan.

Whitepapers

• Advancing the Economics of Networking
• Enterprise Data Center Network Reference Architecture
• Implementing HA at the Enterprise Data Center Edge to Connect to a Large Number of Branch Offices
• File Integrity Monitoring: Secure Your Virtual and Physical IT Environments
• Accelerating a Diverse Mix of Traffic Across the WAN
• Boost Productivity While Cutting Costs with Next-generation Collaboration

View more LANS & WANS whitepapers

Webcasts

• PoE Plus: Impact on the PoE Market
• Creating a high performance workplace with wireless networking
• Harnessing the power of communications to increase workplace performance
• How to cut IT costs with wide-area data services (WDS)
• Making data centers the IT strategic focus
• Protecting assets and employees with IP Video Surveillance

View more LANS & WANS webcasts

Special Reports

• Ethernet Services: WAN options mature
• Keeping Spam at Bay
• Get More From Your WAN
• WAN Optimization: How to rev up sluggish applications
• IP address management in 2008 - six things to know
• Network World Executive Guide: Perfecting Application Performance Management

View more LANS & WANS special reports