- 12 myths about how the Internet works
- Smartphone smackdown: Storm vs. iPhone
- IETF: Should we ignore the Kaminsky bug?
- Top 10 wicked cool algorithms
- How to recession-proof yourself
Microsoft's release this week of Hyper-V means there's one more hypervisor in the game -- and one more reason management capabilities will play a large part in determining which vendor will win long-term customer favor by providing the tools to optimize virtual server environments.
Industry watchers say managing virtual server technologies from x86 environments back to the mainframe, across multi-platform hypervisors and consistently alongside physical machines will be a key differentiator among the vendors seeking market domination. VMware remains ahead in managing its own hypervisor technologies, but with Microsoft's entry into the market, analysts say demands will change and customers will need to do more than monitor a single hypervisor technology with their management tools.
"Virtualization is a game-changing technology, and traditional and emerging management players, and the hypervisor providers, are trying to envision the best strategy to manage it," says Cameron Haight, a research vice president at Gartner.
Here’s a look at how VMware and Microsoft rate today in terms of management expertise.
Today a majority of customers using x86 virtual server technology depend upon their hypervisor provider for additional management capabilities, according to Gartner. Most customers using x86 virtual server technology use VMware, and that trend will continue as the company looks to invest further into building out its management capabilities.
VMware has acquired management players Akimbi, Dunes Technologies and B-hive Networks. Akimbi enabled VMware's LabManager product, and Dunes spawned its Lifecycle Manager tool. The more recent B-hive acquisition, which brought application and transaction-level monitoring to VMware, has yet to produce a VMware product.
VMware also counts as an advantage its VirtualCenter management console, VMotion virtual machine migration tool, Distributed Resource Scheduler (DRS) capabilities and High-Availability feature in VMware Infrastructure 3.
"Both VMware and Microsoft have gaps in their management capabilities, but VMware seems to have an advantage of manageability [such as VMotion and DRS] that is built into their virtual infrastructure that is often the reason for their selection," Haight says.
Partner Content
SMART Steps Toward Consolidated Workload Automation
Consolidating job scheduling into a single, comprehensive workload automation solution is a critical first step to effective workload automation (WLA).
White paper on WLA here
A Comprehensive Approach to Practicing ITIL Change Management
Read a compelling whitepaper by EMA, Inc. to learn best practices for integrating workload automation.
Whitepaper here
2 Minutes to IT workload automation
BMC CONTROL-M can put money back into your IT budget and strip the complexity and risk from workload automation.
View video here
Gain a faster, cheaper way to manage workload
BMC CONTROL-M can help you migrate to a workload automation solution to meet your organization’s goals.
Listen here for more info
Comments (2)
Hypervisor Management ToolsBy sarangan on July 30, 2008, 2:53 pmData centers managers are now bracing for the next wave of heterogeneity - hypervisors. In the 90s, a heterogeneous data center usually meant Windows, NetWare,...
Reply | Read entire comment
Cross-Hypervisor Management Tools KeyBy Steve Henning on July 3, 2008, 12:32 amCertainly with Microsoft entering the virtualization fray, customers will have a serious option to VMware. Now independent management vendors will need to manage...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments