 |
||||
 | |
| ||
|
||||
| ||||
|
|
||||
Careers
Convergence
Data Center
LANs
Net/Systems Mgmt.
NOSes
Outsourcing
Routers/Switches
Security
Service Providers
Small/Med.
Storage
WAN Services
Web/e-commerce
Wireless/Mobile
Newsletters
This Week in NW
Tests/Reviews
Buyer's Guides
Opinion
Forums
Special Issues
How to/Primers
Case Studies
Network Life
Encyclopedia
IT Briefings
NOSes /
Microsoft disputes research about Win 2000
Tests examine Win 2000 on Gigabit Ethernet.
 
|
|||
 | |||
|
IT executives looking to pump up the performance on their back-end systems by marrying Gigabit Ethernet and Windows 2000 may want to take another look under the operating system's hood.
A recent study by Tolly Research, the independent testing arm of the Tolly Group, found that Windows NT delivers Gigabit Ethernet throughput equal to or better than Win 2000. Tolly's finding contrasts Microsoft's testing that found Win 2000 optimized to deliver gains in Gigabit Ethernet throughput.
Microsoft gets tough with independent testers
Heavy-handed tactics, licensing restrictions highlight debate over software testing. Network World, 3/5/01.
Tolly results
NTtcp is a packet-blasting tool that measures throughput on different network topologies and hardware setups. Chariot of a traffic simulation tool that drives real application data over network infrastructures. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Some end users have taken notice of Tolly's findings, but weigh them against other issues. "I have found generally that NT throughput is a little quicker, but with Windows 2000 I can run applications like Exchange 2000," says Josh Mitts, an IT administrator at Treasure on the Net, an online gaming company.
Microsoft officials say Tolly's conclusions are not a fair comparison, citing variables such as client operating system, network adapters, LAN design, traffic-generating tools and methodologies.
But Tolly says enterprise customers looking at Gigabit Ethernet don't need to rush into Win 2000 for performance gains.
Advertisement: |
"It is a good [operating system], but have they embellished in certain areas? Definitely," says Chris Eichman, research manager for the Win 2000 track at Tolly Research. "If you are migrating [for] increased Gigabit Ethernet performance, now is not the time."
The Tolly test was a response to Microsoft tests last February that showed 1G bit/sec throughput on Win 2000 with a standard frame size of 1,518 bytes and 2G bit/sec throughput using 9,018-byte Jumbo Frames with a dual-processor/dual network interface card (NIC) setup. In contrast, Tolly was only able to record a high throughput at 837M bit/sec using Jumbo Frames and a dual-processor/dual-NIC configuration on Win 2000. The highest throughput was on NT - 842.3M bit/sec - using the same configuration.
Microsoft is urging enterprise customers to combine Gigabit Ethernet and Win 2000 to improve performance of back-end cluster and transaction servers. Gigabit Ethernet use is expected to skyrocket in the next three years. Last year, there were 4.2 million switch ports and/or NICs shipped for LAN use, according to Cahners In-Stat Group. That number is expected to roughly double every year through 2004.
Tolly says Microsoft's throughput numbers may be inflated by the NTttcp packet-blasting tool it used and by testing on a highly segmented LAN. Microsoft officials admitted their LAN had two clients per segment.
Tolly used the NTttcp tool, but also used NetIQ's application traffic simulation tool Chariot 4.0, which it says is a more real-world test.
With Chariot in a single-processor/single-NIC configuration, Win 2000 throughput was 416M bit/sec compared to 442M bit/sec for NT with standard frames, and 539.5M bit/sec using Jumbo Frames compared to 534.9M bit/sec for NT. The latter is only one of two categories in which Win 2000 outperformed NT. The other was the single-processor/single-NIC test using NTttcp and standard frames where the comparison was 582M bit/sec vs. 581.
Microsoft says the comparison is not apples-to-apples.
"Their methodology and configuration is unable to yield similar results . . . because of constraints introduced by their testing methods," says Steven Adler, product manager for Win 2000.
One key, Adler says, is Tolly used some NT 4.0 clients, which lowered throughput because they don't have a TCP/IP stack optimized for Jumbo Frames and off-loading work to a NIC.
"We are not in disagreement with their results, but we do strongly disagree with the conclusions they have drawn," he says.
The conclusion, Tolly's Eichman says, is that "your own environment, topology and switch architecture will dramatically affect your results."
Related Links
Microsoft gets tough with independent testers
Heavy-handed tactics, licensing restrictions highlight debate over software testing. Network World, 3/5/01.
 |
 |
 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
