A lot has been written over the last couple of weeks regarding the recent FCC Triennial Review and how it bodes for the further demise of the competitive marketplace and the increase of creative service offers from the incumbents. We refuse to believe that we can enter a time machine and go back to the 1980s' world of telecommunications. That world would be defined as follows:

1) A small number of players owning the marketplace (ILECs, IXCs).
2) Very little competitive choice for consumers (ILECs, IXCs).
3) New services only offered after much review and finally a launch under duress.
4) Price points looking like a monopolistic market.

There are a lot of reasons why this might happen, but we hope for many reasons that it won't.

Market Consolidation

Has the market continued to consolidate? Yes. Will the market continue to consolidate? Probably yes. This isn't necessarily a bad thing: it will be for those who end up without gainful employment, but when reviewed in terms of capacity this consolidation might hold a silver lining. It's not a new story that the industry still has too much backbone capacity available across the remaining players. Although many supporters of the FCC rulings have argued that without the need for resale at a reduced rate the incumbents will deploy additional capacity, there are reasons why this will not happen without further consolidation.

The hope is that as competitors raise their rates to support enhancement of their networks or resale of higher priced loops, the end users will flock back to the incumbents giving them the need to deploy additional capacity and return the core equipment vendors to the fat and happy days of the past. In order for this happen, there still needs to be services offered by the incumbents that end users want to buy at price points they will accept.

Market consolidation alone will not cause mass market America to run out and buy broadband services they don't think they need at a price point they feel is too expensive. So will there be fewer players? Yes. Is this necessarily a bad thing? No. Does it mean we go back to monopolistic players being the only players in town? We don't believe so. And will it increase broadband adoption and carrier spending? We don't believe so either.