<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>channels</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4538</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Manufacturers&#039; Inside Sales vs. Channel Partners: the good, the bad and the ugly </title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31156</link>
 <description>  &lt;p&gt;Manufacturers&amp;#39; inside sales versus Channel Partners; the good, the bad and the ugly &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I received a call from a CIO this weekend while playing golf, the call started on the 11th hole and went to the 17&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; hole. He has been working with a good channel partner but received a quote from the manufacturer inside sales group on a renewal purchase. First he was confused as to why they would have inside sales agents working with customer when they have channel partners and why would the cost be less than the channel partners cost. He was confused of whom to go with and asked me if this was a trend that I was seeing where manufacturers would be going with more inside sales and moving away from the channel partners, just using them for warranty work if needed.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31156&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31156#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/84">Outsourcing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4538">channels</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8814">Larry Chaffin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8815">Pluto Networks</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:00:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Larry Chaffin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31156 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Reading the Tea Leaves: Should Linksys Go Away?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17923</link>
 <description>The ongoing debate has resurfaced again. Uberpulse.com has published a video of John Chambers telling European press that “It will all come over time into a Cisco brand. The reason we kept the Linksys brand is because it was better known in the U.S. than even Cisco was for the consumer. As you go globally there’s very little advantage in that.”
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17923&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17923#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4538">channels</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/95">Linksys</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:14:53 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Channelguy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">17923 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
