I've written a lot in this blog about standards and network architecture. One of the key things you can do for your organization's success in addition to good, written standards is a proper team organization split between engineering and operations roles.
If there is one truth in all network team organizations is that there is a clear difference and separation of roles between engineering and operations. Engineering is about providing new solutions to problems. Those solutions may be in the form of single purpose engineering designs, new technologies, design templates, standards, application projects, or lab results. With all of these there is something new being added to the current network environment.
Operations is about maintaining, monitoring, and fixing the current environment. It is not about new things, it's about making the current environment works as best as possible. Operations also goes beyond just outages. It deals with ensuring the network matches current standards, auditing, network management, testing failover, capacity management, and outages.
These two groups have distinct roles. Network Engineers can easily understand what their role is depending on which organization they are in. It leads to efficiencies for both groups. Design engineers can focus on projects and new technologies and not be distracted by operations issues. Operations engineers know they need to keep the network running and do not need to worry about new technologies until there is an official handoff from engineering.
And that brings us to the key communication between the two teams: the handoff. At some point new things need to become part of the real network. To make this happen, there needs to be a handoff from the engineering team to the operations team. This provides operations everything they need to maintain the new technology. Some of the information provided:
This handoff can happen in different ways depending on the size of your organization. Smaller organizations may have adhoc meetings. Larger organizations may be more process driven with only a documentation handoff. A good way to get the operations team up and running is to make them the implementation team. That way engineering does all the designs and testing, but the operations team actually implements the new technology. That way they get immediate experience with the new technology and can control its release (based on engineering's guidance).
Even if you have a small network team, you should make this split. I have used it at three jobs now and each time it was a success. When I arrived at my current employer, they had the teams split between LAN and WAN. That didn't work. Then they tried core vs. edge, but no one could define what that meant. Then a co-worker and I suggested this engineering and operations split which had worked for us before and it was implemented. That was three and a half years ago and we are still setup that way. In fact, it has worked so well for networking our entire IT infrastructure organization - including storage, hosting, telecom, and security - is now organized this way. It doesn't matter the size of your organization. It works with any size.
More >From the Field blog entries:
CCDE Practical Beta Exam is Tomorrow
Now for Some Thoughts on the Nexus 1000V
Cisco's First Software Switch - the Nexus 1000V
The Single Silliest Statement I've Ever Seen from Cisco
Go to Cisco Subnet for more Cisco news, blogs, discussion forums, security alerts, book giveaways, and more.
Michael Morris is a communications engineering manager at a $3 billion high-tech company. His background is in enterprise WANs working with telcos, and developing large-scale routing designs. He has worked on networks at government and corporate organizations, including networks at two Fortune 10 companies. In his current role, he leads large-scale IT networking projects and develops and maintains architectural standards for data networks, storage area networks, IP Telephony, and security. Michael is a CCIE and has 11 years experience in networking and communications, including four years as a paratrooper in the U.S. Army. He has a bachelor's degree in MIS from the University at Buffalo. Recently, he was awarded the Network Professional Association® (NPA) Professional Excellence and Innovation Award for his work on network architecture, templates and enterprise MPLS design.
The opinions expressed in this Weblog are those of the writer and may not represent the opinions of Network World.
|
|
Post new comment