Microsoft's desperate struggle to acquire Yahoo! has hung up not on disagreement over a fair price for the latter's online advertising operations, sources say, but rather the value of Yahoo!'s iconic exclamation point.
"Ballmer just won't budge on this, uh, point," says one source close to the negotiations. "He told me, 'Hell's bells, you can look up 'exclamation point' in any dictionary and see a picture of me next to the definition. Why should I pay a penny for theirs?' "
Yahoo! isn't asking for pocket change. When Microsoft earlier this month pulled the plug on its offer of $47.5 billion, or $33 per share, Yahoo! was reportedly demanding at least $1.50 per share more -- about $2 billion -- exclusively for the exclamation point. This despite the fact that Yahoo!'s founders only added the mark after discovering the unadorned word Yahoo had already been trademarked.
With news over the weekend of a renewed overture by Microsoft, it's possible that Ballmer may be softening on his not-a-penny-for-the-point position.
Experts insist he has no choice, given the ample precedent for corporations placing hefty price tags on their famous punctuation. And, as one noted to me, the exclamation point on Yahoo!'s homepage may be the only one on the Internet that actually yodels when clicked.
"That alone tacks a couple hundred million on the price," he said.
Wall Street types familiar with the situation inevitably recount the 2005 war between SBC and AT&T over the valuation of the latter's ampersand. At one point the negotiations nearly broke off after SBC claimed it had no intention of paying for the ampersand because it had no intention of retaining the AT&T moniker.
"Threats don't get any emptier," a source told me. "That $16 billion deal was a $15 billion deal without the amp."
In its fiscal year 2007 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, EMC2 affixed a $50 million "estimated market value" on the company's exponent, while noting that it would be significantly higher if more people knew what it meant or how to create one in Microsoft Word (type a normal 2, highlight it, press ctrl, shift and the plus sign simultaneously).
"Everybody knows the Yahoo! point," my source noted, "and the (bleeping) thing yodels. EMC's silly little two doesn't do squat."
Sooner or later, Microsoft is going to have to pony up for the point.
Welcome regulars and passersby. Here are a few more recent Buzzblog items. And, if you'd like to receive Buzzblog via e-mail newsletter, here's where to sign up.
Worst of the lot for two years running: PCMall and PCConnection.
YouTube's down, everybody panic.
How could anyone not know that Titan's atmosphere is mostly nitrogen?
Photographer/Internet 1, Bully 0.
"Bribe" or miswording: You make the call.
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries.
Google renames the Persian Gulf.
Top 10 Buzzblog posts for '07: Verizon's there, of course, along with Gates, Wikipedia and the guy who lost a girlfriend to Blackberry's blackout.
When not blogging, I am a Network World news editor and write the 'Net Buzz column.
The opinions expressed in this Weblog are those of the writer and may not represent the opinions of Network World.
|
|
Why is the move desperate?
Curious by your claim that this is a desperate move by Microsoft? If another company makes a move to acquire an established technology versus reinventing the wheel, they are considered strategic. Microsoft makes a similar move, into a realm they know they are weak in, and it is called desperate? Interesting to say the least.
Desparate...Pathethic...take your pick
After the failures MSN/Live Microsoft is quite desperately trying to buy their way into a technology they've initially failed to notice, later marginalized and finally failed to develop for themselves.
Post new comment