Network World
Saturday, August 30, 2008
DNSstuff.com
Get information about your IP
IP Information
50+ On-demand DNS and network tools

Community

Navigation

3 major problems with study

0

Looking at the In-Stat report, there were several flaws or misleading assumptions made. Another thing to note is that the methodology is missing specific products tested for each vendor.

Here are few observations to consider when reading this report:

1. Not a similar comparison between products sets

a. Non-enterprise class products and enterprise / service provider class switch vendors are compared equally here. SoHo and small business brand switches are inherently going to use less power since they perform less functions, deliver far less performance, less reliable, etc. It is like comparing a Formula 1 race car to a Prius; they have some similarities but they designed for completely different functions.

2. Methodology missing most of the significant details

a. We could not determine what products were being compared here at first review. Are they old legacy products compared with competitor’s newer products? SoHo products compared with enterprise and carrier-class products? We actually found out that In-Stat compared an end-of-sale product, which was meant for very high performance applications, with much newer basic connectivity branch office products. Comparing an old product set with newer competitor offerings is very misleader to the reader.

3. Calculations based off incorrect data

a. Data used in this report was off what companies stated the max power output of the power source can produce. However, for enterprise/SP-class products, the additional power in the power supply is there for resiliency. The switch may only use 50% or so of the power sources capability; thus putting top enterprise/SP class switching products incorrectly at the bottom of the “green” list.

Based off the recent Best of Interop Awards, Foundry had the most “Green” products http://www.foundrynet.com/company/newsroom/pr/2008/04-30-2008.html

Additionally, Foundry is positioned in the highly regarded “leaders” quadrant of the Gartner Global Campus LAN Magic Quadrant 2008 (http://www.foundrynet.com/outbound/lead-gen/2008/gartner-mq.html), making them a very appealing networking vendor to enterprises and service providers worldwide.

Pavel Radda
Marketing Manager
Foundry Networks, Inc.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <i> <b> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <br /> <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Latest software headlines from Network World:

Quick fix for Firefox 3 bug with Yahoo Mail

Continuent launches open-source database scale-out stack

Google extends Apps Premier credit for Gmail outages

Cisco strengthens UC story with PostPath buy

Picture2Life online photo editor

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9  10  next 

Advertisement: