- BlackBerry Storm vs. the iPhone
- 2008 IT industry graveyard
- Top 10 worst uses for Windows
- Economic crisis means double duty for IT pros
- BlackBerry Storm, RIM's first touchscreen device, rolls in
Newsletters | Podcasts | Chats | Opinions | RSS Feeds | This Week In Print | IT Careers | Community | Reports | Downloads | Slideshows | New Data Center
Partner Sites:Application Performance Solutions | App Performance | Networking Solution | SafeGuard Enterprise Solution Center | SOA | Test your Web Filter | Value of WDS
The Electronic Frontier Foundation's successful Patent Busting Project may itself be busted by language in "reform" legislation pending before the U.S. Senate.
This "reform" as it stands will instead protect frivolous patents from the EFF and similar watchdogs by limiting to one year after a patent's granting the time in which it could be challenged by anyone other than those suffering direct financial harm.
The head of the EFF project, patent attorney Emily Berger, tells me: "While we generally support patent reform, a bill that does not allow us to continue to file third-party reexamination requests would diminish the quality of existing patents and offer more opportunity to abuse the patent system. This is contrary to the goals of the bill."
EFF last week sent letters of protest to the ranking members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), and Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.). Wrote Berger on the EFF blog: "Today EFF submitted a letter to Senators Leahy and Specter calling their attention to a portion of the Draft Judiciary Committee Report of the Patent Reform Act of 2007 which has the potential to kill EFF's Patent Busting Project."
"The public has a right to defend itself against patents that should never have been granted, and organizations like EFF exist to assist in this process," Berger wrote. "Reexamination proceedings are essential for us to continue this work."
By late last week Leahy's office had not replied to the letter or my own requests for comment. (I opted not to contact Specter's office because I didn't want to distract the senator or his staff from the important work of policing National Football League rules enforcement.)
The Patent Busting Project has notched a string of impressive victories.
Last year, the project succeeded in convincing the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to revoke a patent held by Clear Channel Communications that covered a system for recording and distributing live musical performances. In December, it was the distance-learning site Test.com wilting under the patent-busting heat, as the PTO rejected all 16 claims upon which its patent rests.
Everyone complains about frivolous patents. The EFF is doing something about them. It would be a shame if that effort were to fall victim to "help" from Washington.
Partner Content
CA Network & Voice Resource Center
Comprehensive Network & Voice Management Visit CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center and get insights into industry best practices, information that helps you to address your challenges.
CA Network & Voice Management Resource Center
Managing Voice Over IP for Successful Convergence
Voice over IP (VoIP) has much to offer in cost savings but some customers have concerns about VoIP call quality compared to the quality of traditional voice services. This white paper will help you learn how to take the right steps so that voice quality is assured.
Managing VoIP for Successful Convergence
The Changing Face of Network Management
Managing your network is serious business. This paper discusses the benefits of integrating configuration change-awareness into your network fault management solution
Download Whitepaper
Comment