- Nokia's new N97 vs. the iPhone
- 10 Microsoft research projects
- Hard to get justice in MySpace case
- Smartphone smackdown: Storm vs. iPhone
- Apple removes antivirus support page
I just got some feedback from reader Stephanie Bice, the regional manager of Digital Warehouse, about my recent Gearhead column concerning my adventures with Network Solutions' e-commerce offerings.
Stephanie wrote: "I am stuck in a similar situation with an accounting/software package my company purchased last year. Your statement that ‘the sheer enormity of the product means you can't find all of the serious gotchas until you are deeply committed to using the product' struck a cord with me, as that is exactly what happened in my situation. And with the almost $100K price tag I paid, not to mention more than $50K in support (if you even want to call it that), I feel a bit ripped off."
I think that using the phrase “I feel a bit ripped off" when $150K is involved qualifies as a serious understatement. I talked with Stephanie and it turns out her tale is another good example of a dirty little industry secret – in this case, the fact that when you implement complex software there's a high probability you won't be happy with the result.
Digital Warehouse's problems started when a consultant recommended Sage Software's ERP product and Sage, in turn, recommended a reseller to work with. After an expensive needs analysis the reseller recommended Sage MAS 500 ERP.
Much of this happened before Stephanie arrived at Digital Warehouse but she, of course, wound up dealing with the mess that resulted once the software was installed. Stephanie's biggest complaint is the system doesn't match the company's needs and even simple operations require far more effort than is reasonable. In short, Stephanie reckons the company was seriously oversold.
The harder nosed amongst you might be muttering, “caveat emptor," but let's consider what it means for a small company to implement something as complex as a new accounting system. First of all there's the issue that, while the client knows what its business needs are and can inspect potential solutions to see if there's a good match, the reality is the devil is in the details.
It's never the big stuff that gets you, it's the little stuff — the lack of a report you need, the absence of an export or import format, the lack of options for handling just one detail of workflow — those are the things you don't know about because they are buried so deep.
Comments (11)
not so wise SageBy Allan Hytowitz on May 2, 2008, 8:17 amStephanie, My condolences at your buying Sage's "pig in a poke" however, your frustration does NOT surprise me. I have been setting up small business users...
Reply | Read entire comment
Complex software? Plan to fail!By Shelley on February 15, 2008, 5:44 pmHaving read this article, I’m amazed that so little focus or insight is provided about the process used to select the software in the first place. The article correctly...
Reply | Read entire comment
FollowupBy mchinsky on February 15, 2008, 4:15 pmI've actually talked to both sides of this situation now that the company who was implemented actually named the VAR who did the implementation. I again state,...
Reply | Read entire comment
The best safeguard is a goodBy morganj on February 14, 2008, 3:02 pmThe best safeguard is a good user group. I operate a major course management system for our school. This is complex software comparable to the accounting software...
Reply | Read entire comment
RE: Complex software? Plan to fail!By ITGuy on February 13, 2008, 11:20 pmI find this article a bit irresponsible, one sided, and providing no enriching value whatsoever. Instead of taking the information that was provided to him and...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments