To all intents and purposes it looks like we have seen the final shoe drop on the current phase of the Microsoft antitrust case.

The result might not be exactly what Microsoft wanted when the whole process started but it sure is not what many others wanted. U.S. District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly basically endorsed the settlement negotiated between the U.S. Department of Justice and Microsoft earlier this year. The judge tweaked a few things but left most of the earlier settlement in place, including a provision that should speed the adoption of Linux in many parts of the world.

For the paranoid, one provision in the 300-page decision stands out: "No provision of this Final Judgment shall: 1. Require Microsoft to document, disclose or license to third parties: (a) portions of APIs or Documentation or portions or layers of Communications Protocols the disclosure of which would compromise the security of a particular installation or group of installations of antipiracy, antivirus, software licensing, digital rights management, encryption or authentication systems, including without limitation, keys, authorization tokens or enforcement criteria; or (b) any API, interface or other information related to any Microsoft product if lawfully directed not to do so by a governmental agency of competent jurisdiction."

The (a) section seems to say Microsoft can withhold information about their APIs if they claim that releasing the information would endanger the security of the system. It does not take a paranoid to expect Microsoft to do this because it already has when talking about its own special tweak on the IETF's Kerberos standard.

The (b) section is pure paranoid fodder. This provision says that a U.S. government agency, it does not take a court, can tell Microsoft to not release the API specifications. Some of you might remember the stories circulating early in 1999 about a "NSAkey" discovered in all recent Microsoft operating systems. The speculation was that the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) had a magic key that would let it break into any computer running Microsoft operating systems anytime it wanted to. (Search for "NSAkey" on Google to see some of the thousand references still around.)

A number of foreign governments became absolutely convinced that the U.S. government does have at least one back door into Microsoft operating systems and have actively pushed alternatives for a while. Now along comes this provision in the antitrust settlement to help reinforce their suspicions.

Whitepapers

• File Integrity Monitoring: Secure Your Virtual and Physical IT Environments
• 5 Biggest Blunders when Building Spreadsheet Applications in Java
• Automating Excel Reports: Five Approaches
• Java: Four Server-based Approaches
• 6 Simple Steps to Disaster Recovery Planning
• Boost Productivity While Cutting Costs with Next-generation Collaboration

View more SOFTWARE whitepapers

Webcasts

• PoE Plus: Impact on the PoE Market
• Creating a high performance workplace with wireless networking
• Harnessing the power of communications to increase workplace performance
• Making data centers the IT strategic focus
• Protecting assets and employees with IP Video Surveillance
• Stay out of the headlines: Detecting and preventing network intrusions

View more SOFTWARE webcasts

Special Reports

• Executive Guide: Virtualization Reality Check
• WAN Optimization: The Ultimate No Brainer
• Keeping Spam at Bay
• Application Performance Management Executive Guide
• Executive Guide: Building a Service Oriented Architecture
• IT Buyers Guide To: Collaboration

View more SOFTWARE special reports